Hello, I want to give my sincere apologies. When I read mjp's original messages, it triggered the pains I felt in high school from bullying. All of my life, I've been told I'm an Arab and from a backwards culture, but when I actually studied it, I realized this wasn't the case. I am not Arab, and also, Arabic culture is not as "backwards" as people think. I do not like it when people talk about Iran without actually spending time studying it. Watching the film Persepolis is not enough to get a grasp on the complexities of what really happened... It's far more nuanced than that.
I feel like Iran/Persia is an extremely complicated country to understand, and not even I can say what's ultimately best for it. As I made it clear, there was a time Iran was a theocracy, yet also very accepting of differing beliefs. This was during the Safavid time period (which was more Sufi), so a theocracy does not automatically mean a country is "backwards" or "uncivilized". In some situations, it can strengthen a community and encourage solidarity. I dislike how the average European or American tends to view Iran as being more progressive during its Zoroastrian time period, and while I respect my Zoroastrian roots (e.g., Nowrooz holiday), it is incorrect to attribute Iran's current oppressive regime to something inherent in Islam. The Sassanian Empire was also extremely oppressive, unlike the Achaeminid Empire.
I am a Buddhist. Contrary to popular belief, it was not the Arabs that eradicated Buddhism from Iran... but it was the Sassanian Zoroastrian clergy... Bahram I also had Mani (founder of Manichaeism) killed. Like I've said, Iran is an extremely complex culture, and saying what is best for Iran is not simple. Fixing sociopolitical issues cannot be reduced to generalities.
What I ultimately feel is best for the people of Iran is either a moderate form of Islamic Theocracy (something like Sufism) or a socialist government. Iran should not move towards a Westernized post-industrial capitalist lifestyle, and even now - it is moving in that direction. By doing that, it will lose its rich poetic tradition and its strong sense of community. The only reason Israel and USA want to destroy Iran is because of the balance of powers in the Middle East; if Iran gets too strong, then that would seriously throw off the balance of power in the region.
Iran is not like Saudi Arabia in the least... It has the #1 facility in Stem Cell Research for crying out loud! This is why I am asking you guys to stop acting like you know what is best for the country. In a sense, it is better for the oppressive regime to stay than for Iran to become a "secular Democracy" or revert back to something like Mohammad Reza Pahlavi.
Also, I sympathize with radical traditionalist in some sense. I do sympathize with people like Varg Vikernes, while not agreeing with everything they claim... I do not think it's possible for man to get over its ethnocentric impulses. It's best not to speak of knowing what's best for others, especially when one has little understanding of the culture. This was ultimately my point: I do not know what is best for others, including you, but you most certainly do not know what's best for a country either... That's all...
Being born in America... I feel as it currently has more problems than Iran, as I made clear in my last post. The 2-party system is holding it back. If someone like Jill Stein won, America would move in the right direction, but I view that as unlikely, given how she was treated in last election...