10/27: Haunts of a Dirty Old Man: Charles Bukowski's LA tour

Father Luke

Founding member
mjp, I'd suggest you read the reviews our tours have received and also the reviews my three books have received before you suggest that what we're doing is parasitical.
It would be easier if you gave him a chance to think you were something other than par--- wait. I'll speak for myself. How'zat?

It would be easier for me, just some random schmo poster, -- on a Forum at what may arguably be called Charles Bukowski's homepage, where people come to discuss things about Charles Bukowski,-- it would be easier for me to tend to believe that you are something other than a money makin' operation, spamming a board if you made more posts like these: C L I C K.
esotouric said:
I can only imaging that you're making the assumption that our passengers get in a bus and are driven to a series of addresses, with nothing contributed beyond a "look at this, somebody lived here." That's just not the case. Each thematic tour is a biographical narrative, with complex stories unfolding over the course of the journey. We're proud of the work we do, and constantly working to improve it, and our relationships with the people and places who should be part of each tour.

I'm one of the good guys, and my life and work speak to that.

But not your posts here. Dig? My experience of you here is succinctly summed up in this post: C L I C K
esotouric said:
Finally, mjp, it seems like we've been through this once before. The last time I explained what we were doing, you replied somewhat positively.
https://bukowskiforum.com/showpost.php?p=21727&postcount=15

How many times do I need to explain and defend our work before you stop assuming the worst of well-meaning, hard-working people who are just trying to raise the visibility of your favorite writer?

Someone is missing what the point is.

C L I C K vs C L I C K

What's the word, Thunderbird.
 
Yes, and it follows that perhaps if I hadn't been made to feel so unwelcome here, and seen Lauren from the Delongpre preservation campaign made to feel unwelcome, I'd have been more inclined to hang out when time allowed and make more posts like the book store suggestion. But who but a masochist wants to spend more time than necessary -- and it is necessary to get word out about these tours if we're going to keep offering them -- where they're vilified?

Just a side note: I just got off the phone with John Dullaghan-- you know, the fellow whose film "Born into This" has an entire section on this forum dedicated to it? He said that Linda Bukowski called him last night to wish him and the tour well, and told him a bunch of fun facts about her husband that he'll be sharing with the passengers today.
 

Father Luke

Founding member
Name dropping.
More commercials.
Name calling.

I can't think of a more unappealing afternoon than hanging in that kind of company.

I'll pass.
 

mjp

Founding member
mjp, I'd suggest you read the reviews our tours have received...before you suggest that what we're doing is parasitical.
I said, "...in my opinion, the people who run Esotouric are parasites..." That differentiates between you as a person and your work.
I have a d/b/a called Lost in the Grooves...There's nothing sinister about it, yet you keep mentioning it as if it were proof that what we're doing is corrupt.
I thought you had a d/b/a/ called Esotouric and an LLC called Lost in the Grooves. One of us seems to be a little confused about how your businesses are structured. I'm just reading your site.

I bring it up to emphasize the point that you are running a business, not a philanthropic organization, as you would seem to like everyone to believe.
I'm one of the good guys, and my life and work speak to that.
I never suggested that you weren't a good person. You have a habit of twisting people's intent to fit with your defensive responses (the "martyr" in SHILLING MARTYR). It makes me question how accurate any of your writing can possibly be.

What I said was that you were a parasite. There are entire classes of entertaining parasites; music and movie reviewers, etc. But in my opinion they create nothing, and without the work of actual creative people to feed off, they would cease to exist - or have to go get real jobs.
How many times do I need to explain and defend our work before you stop assuming the worst of well-meaning, hard-working people who are just trying to raise the visibility of your favorite writer?
When you stop selling merchandise related to Bukowski I will stop assuming the worst. That is where this whole thing started, and that is where it will end.

My perception of what you are doing is up to you.
 

jordan

lothario speedwagon
i think that the person from the save delongpre campaign got a decent welcome... it was really mjp going up against her, while multiple people were defending her. shit, if she's dealing with the LA CITY COUNCIL, you'd think her skin would be thick enough to withstand FORUM POSTERS. the bukowski board isn't this whole purists-only, we-will-safeguard-his-works-in-the-crypt operation that you are making it out to be. i'm going to start another sentence with "shit" in just a moment. shit, just look at the number of people posting here. it's not like we got together in a back-door webgreement at some point, anointed ourselves the keepers of the buk, and made this forum specifically to exclude those who were working tooth and nail to popularize buk around town. i found this place and was welcomed. i post here all the time. so did many MANY others. just look at some of the threads on the all things bukowski board, and you'll see that many of them are created by new posters who are getting honest, intelligent responses to their questions or positions.

here's the circularity of this argument... you have been asked (at least by me) before - nicely, and friendlyly - to post more and join discussions. your response is that we're shits and why would you want to? so why the F are you continuing to post what is essentially spam? and yes, i'm sorry kim, but it is spam when you cut and paste the description of the bukbird print (which i will recognize as an original representation of a stock character TM draws all the time, and which i kind of like to boot) directly into this forum. seriously, i mean, you could just put a link to your site in your signature or something.

i realize the position you're coming from that you want to popularize something that would be of interest to people here, and i'm sympathetic to that. but when that is coupled with your implicit disdain for everyone here (when MJP is really the only one who has openly attacked you, and although he's the man in charge, he's just one guy among many)-- and be honest that it really is implicit disdain, given that you so much as said that the reason you don't post here more is that you don't like us-- it is a stretch to get people to take your commercial endeavors seriously.

also, let it be noted that i have defended your company in the past, as well as your motives. i have no problem with what you're doing, and i don't necessarily think that the bus tour would be a boring thing. however, you have to realize that you are selling a fairly esoteric product (OH YEAH, three points for me on the pun), and one that is going to get ripped on a lot. it's fantastic that you have linda b's blessing, that john dullaghan is involved, and that you are getting positive write ups. but i think the point here is that, even if your tours were the best things in the history of human experience, it's the way you sell them while pretty much utterly refusing to participate in the FORUM aspect of this FORUM that really cheeses a lot of people off, ESPECIALLY the guy who has spent a lot of time and money to make this place for all of us.

it's really no different than the people that show up to sell bukowski t-shirts or whatever. hundreds of spammers are kicked out every day, and your posts have all been allowed onto the board, which means that, as annoying as it has been for the moderator (i'll speak for him, since he's made that abundantly clear), he's let it go, probably (i'm assuming) BECAUSE it may be of interest to people here. now, if criticism by forum members is too much for you, then so be it. but as the central information resource on the net for bukowski, maybe you could stand to benefit a little bit from what is offered here, rather than using it as a marketing resource? maybe???
 

mjp

Founding member
It's Bukbonics. Check back soon for Bukbonics t-shirts, diaper pants and beer steins.
 

jordan

lothario speedwagon
can't a guy use words that aren't words without getting made fun of?

i also used "webgreement," but no one is making fun of that.

you guys are perceptabulous, you are.
 

Father Luke

Founding member
Twas brillig, and the slithy toves Did gyre and gimble in the wabe

can't a guy use words that aren't wwhsyds without getting mjksksn of?

i also used "webgreement," but no one is mjksksn fun of that.

you gimsoftrs are perceptabulous, you are.

What did he just say?
 
I have to say, the whole profit thing means nothing. If you're going to bash esotouric for making money off of Buk, I guess you would have to bash a really long list of people.

I went on the tour. I had a great time. I got to discuss Bukowski with John Dullagan and and other fans of Bukowski and through these discussions with key people, it only strengthens my dedication to the man and the wonderful gift he left for us all. Besides, it was fun and I consider myself an above average fan and for me it's exciting to see the places because it's not only about the building but it's about space, east hollywood to downtown to san pedro. Those areas represent different phases in his work and life and I think it's very interesting to see those places. Maybe I'm just a boring guy but when they pointed out the firehouse where "firehouse" comes from, it was fun to imagine Jane walking in acting innocent while she fucked everyone in the fire station and Buk took the money while playing cards. Think of those times...it's amazing and all esotouric is doing is bringing you one step closer to being able to imagine those truly foundational points in Bukowski's life.

The whole profit thing doesn't hold much ground. The bus was packed with mostly people who are either fan or maybe just heard the name or read a book or two and everyone came out equally as pleased.

This tour was better then the last and I'm sure the next one will be even better. Charter Buses aren't cheap and I don't think Esotouric is becoming millionaires. They actually very nice people who have a genuine interested in Los Angeles and Los Angeles History. I'm looking forward to the crime tour next time around.

and John Dullaghan is a superb human being. Just a nice guy and very knowledgeable...obviously. For most celebrity hounds, seeing some big name actor gets people excited, but for me, for some of us on this board, seeing John Dullaghan is like meeting Martin Scorsese or something and then to find out he's NOT a Hollywood prick is even better.

I'm not one of those types that Buk should only be read by those that deserve to read Bukowski. I think it should be read by everyone...I think it should be mandatory :-) So I think it's a rather positive move for Esotouric to spread to word to those who may not be familiar with Buk's work. I think the world would be a better place if more people read Buk. I'm not kidding. The truth is that Bukowski will sort them out. No one else needs to. His writing continues to infiltrate the minds of the willing.

No I did not get paid to say this...but I'm not against it either. :-)

Thanks
-jeremy
 

bospress.net

www.bospress.net
Hi,
I have nothing against Esotoutic, but the idea that they find us an unpleasant bunch and only post here when they HAVE to while promoting their business is what bothers me. They have made it known that they avoid our presence as much as is possible, only showing up to promote themselves whenever they have seats on their bus to fill. That is far different than a member posting something for sale and then leting us know about it and selling it to the first person interested. Sure, these members are making money off of the site, but they are also contributing and are here because they want to be here and not because it is a great way to drum up business.

And truthfully, I don't have anything against Esotouric, or the DeLongpre folks. I just don't like feeling like I'm being used any more than I like it when we see the folks post spam on this forum while PRETENDING that they have an intereste in this forum, when, in fact, it is all part of a way to line their pockets and they could not tell you the difference between Bukowski and Bonsai....

Bill
 
In the interest of openness why not create a Shilling Martyr thread where anyone who wants to pimp anything Buk can post-of course if that thread leads to a virus that destroys the posting computer or blocks them from ever entering another thread then....well thats what happens to martyrs.
 

mjp

Founding member
Jeremy, I'm sure the bus rides are fun for a lot of people. The Bukowski tours are only a small part of Esotouric's business though. But you may have noticed that they do not have four pages of Black Dahlia, John Fante or Crime Clown garbage for sale. Why not? Where are the Raymond Chandler shot glasses, baby bibs and tote bags? Why is it only Bukowski they "honor" in that way?

Look at it this way; Black Sparrow never tried to sell you a Bukowski tote bag or baby bib. Anyone who does - in my opinion - is no different than the souvenir shops on Hollywood boulevard or the nickel and dime losers on eBay hawking their "vintage" t-shirts and refrigerator magnets. It's all shit.

And what's with people (not just Jeremy) saying, "they aren't becoming millionaires"? It's like the old "would you have sex with me for a million dollars" joke. We have already established the fact that they are whores. The rest is just haggling over price.
 
Well, actually, just to be fair, the little magnet thing I purchased, you know, those word magnets that you're supposed to arrange into something witty for your refrigerator...well this "product" is made by ecco/HarperCollinsPublishers.

"You Should Be Reading

CHARLES BUKOWSKI
ecco
Am Imprint of HarperCollinsPublishers
www.harpercollins.com
---------------------------------------
see your HarperCollins sales rep to order
or call 1-800-242-7737"

I like the magnet that says "whore" personally. You said Black Sparrow, so I guess technically you're right, but I'm making an assumption that you're including the current publisher as well.

A Bukowski baby bib would be kind of funny in my opinion.

-jeremy
 

cirerita

Founding member
Ecco is not by a long shot BSP. Different marketing strategies, different approach to their products, different budget... and I was going to say, different author as well ;)
 

mjp

Founding member
A Bukowski baby bib would be kind of funny in my opinion.
Maybe it would be, but who should profit from it? And who should decide if it is an appropriate product to use Bukowski to sell? Shouldn't that be up to his estate?

Well, actually, just to be fair, the little magnet thing I purchased, you know, those word magnets that you're supposed to arrange into something witty for your refrigerator...well this "product" is made by ecco/HarperCollinsPublishers.
I was referring to the bootleg junk on eBay, not an HC/Ecco promo item.
 

mjp

Founding member
It's an old joke:

Man: Would you have sex with me for a million dollars?
Woman: Well...I suppose I would, yes.
Man: Would you have sex with me for $10?
Woman: Of course not! What do you think I am!?
Man: We've already established what you are, now we're just haggling over price.

A few people (including Kim) have said they are "not getting rich" by exploiting Bukowski, which seems to be some sort of justification for the exploitation being okay.

So my question is, at what price is it not okay anymore? $1,000? $100,000? Half a million?

If you think it would be wrong for them to become millionaires exploiting Bukowski, and I think it's wrong that they make $1 exploiting Bukowski, then we believe the same thing. We just assign a different number to it.
 
Last edited:

ROC

It is what it is
It's an old joke:

Man: Would you have sex with me for a million dollars?
Woman: Well...I suppose I would, yes.
Man: Would you have sex with me for $10?
Woman: Of course not! What do you think I am!?
Man: We've already established what you are, now we're just haggling over price.

Attributed to Mark Twain, no?
 

Father Luke

Founding member
It's an old joke:

Man: Would you have sex with me for a million dollars?
Woman: Well...I suppose I would, yes.
Man:

(snip)

Man: I'll take a dollar's worth.

That's an old jail house joke,
which should put the rest of the post in a somewhat different context.

See if it don't.

A few people (including Kim) have said they are "not getting rich" by exploiting Bukowski, which seems to be some sort of justification for the exploitation being okay.

So my question is, at what price is it not okay anymore? $1,000? $100,000? Half a million?

I'll take a dollar's worth.

If you think it would be wrong for them to become millionaires exploiting Bukowski, and I think it's wrong that they make $1 exploiting Bukowski, then we believe the same thing. We just assign a different number to it.

i can dig it.
 
i can dig it too--honestly, i hadn't given it much thought, but i think mjp makes an entirely logical and, i have to say, entertaining argument. mjp--are you a lawyer in real life?
 

Bukfan

"The law is wrong; I am right"
It's an old joke...
I see. It sounds like something Groucho Marx could have said (yes, I'm a marxist too - of the Groucho kind :) )!

I'm with you! Exploitation is exploitation - the dollar figures are secondary!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Am I really that big an asshole?
No, you're not an asshole, but the wit and slightly acerbic charm of the argument definitely help make your point. And I think, I could be wrong, but that is part of why esotouric couldn't really say "good-bye bukowski.net" and had to come back for an attempt at a final word.

Also, for what it's worth, the reply about esotouric's--whom I have nothing against, I suppose--request to take the "shilling martyr" photo down: priceless.
 
Top