Should be out through Criterion from mid-December:
https://www.criterion.com/films/28657-burroughs-the-movie
not being a big Foo fan. They are just ok. They get too much credit for being more than what they are, just a hard rock band.
It sure sounds like Catch-22See how that works?
Or preferably not.God save the queen.
Of course and I hope David Grohl would.Anyone who actually was "rock royalty" would disavow the title, so it doesn't really exist.
Yourself and D Gray argue fairly it's a case of mistaken identity, not being particularly original or innovative, perhaps ditto for Nirvana?I guess I think rock royalty should have the most awesomest, killerest, coolest, most transcendent rock n' roll ever. He does seem like a cool dude tho. We're arguing the qualifications for rock royalty. HA!
he seems like a nice enough guy I guess.
He do be cool PD, he do... I think your criteria for senior statesman status (felt like daffy duck saying that - too heavy on the S's) is probably stricter than mine.Elder statesman? Ok. I guess as long as he disavows the title and just be's cool.
Probably right, the Foo Fighters have too much fun, not miserable sods like Nirvana, Joy Division or The Smiths (as much as I love them).that's his downfall, artistically speaking. he's too nice and well adjusted to do anything interesting or edgy.
kurt cobain was a great artist cause he was able to combine his personal damage...