I have to do a 2-3 page Analytic Paper on Young in New Orleans...
I was always told/taught/indoctrinated that when reviewing or writing about my personal opinions of literature/poetry/etc that I could say whatever the hell I wanted... as long as I could back it up with evidence from the poem/piece of lit/etc. And evidence can be ambiguous as long as your spin-control switch is turned on and you're being truthful about what you think it could possibly mean. I always was fond of/am fond of of saying something completely off the wall, like, "George Washington's final address blatantly hinted at the fact that he was a drug-addict." and then I would make it kind of like a game for myself to try and make sense of what I was writing, how I would back that up (he did grow marijuana, true fact, but it was said that it was for hemp clothing). If I re-read it and it had nothing to do with my feelings/opinion, I would start over. Writing anything can be astronomically fun if you can make it that way.
I don't know how this helped you analyze "Young in New Orleans", but I felt the need to school you (if anyone didnt' know, I'm finally going for my PhD in English/Literature, not English Lit... gonna be a prof if anyone will have me), to inspire, to excite, entice.
And... who commanded you to analyze Buk's poem? Lovely man/woman he must be...