The Outlaw Poets of American Poetry

What is an outlaw poet, I wonder?

The argument that "the establishment" has some sort of stranglehold over what poetry is published doesn't hold water anymore, and hasn't for, oh, fifty years or so. So tags like "outlaw" make me cringe. Kinda like calling yourself "cool," or "marvelous." A real outlaw wouldn't let their work be in a book with a title like that. They would tell the editors to go fuck themselves.

Maybe that explains Bukowski's absence. ;)

What's wrong with people, anyway? No one gives a shit about anything anymore. I'm surprised they didn't get a grant from Walmart to publish that book (if they didn't). No one has any balls. Poets make me sick.

You know, in a manner of speaking.
mjp, you sound so angry. As a matter of fact, you almost sounded like this when you read my stuff. Except, not as vicious or cusswordy. It almost sounds like you hate poetry. Or maybe you're falling out of love with it.

But I think I can understand why you have an issue with a poet calling themself an outlaw. It's like giving yourself a nickname. It doesn't work unless someone gives you that nickname.

Buk, for example, would never have called himself The Poet Laureate of the Lowlife. But he might have smiled inside at the bestowing of said monicker.
 

mjp

Founding member
Poets as a species.

You know, like Neanderthals, or the French.

That isn't to say there aren't some Neanderthals I could appreciate as individuals. I just don't want to sit around a campfire with a large group of them.

Same thing applies to poets. Most of them are not the kind of people I would spend time with voluntarily. That's all. Life is short. But qualifying that by saying "some poets" strikes me as being cowardly (it's something a poet would say), so I use the blanket classification of poets.

poets.jpg


I sincerely apologize for any misunderstanding, and hope that no one's feelings were hurt.

happy-sun.jpg


God bless you all!
 

mjp

Founding member
Poets convened to decide mjp's fate.
And buried me in their important work.

Hey! Maybe mjp could be the first anti-poet!
I'm not trying to be anything. These fancy computer word-box-thingies pop up and I put my opinions into them. Just like the rest of you.

Now all of you, go write some poems. I heard Literary Mary is warming up for another issue.
 

Rekrab

Usually wrong.
Dead poets tend to be easier to be around than living poets. To the extent possible, I avoid associating with poets, including myself. It's an ugly bred. Poetry, on the other hand, is sometimes okay. Elephand shit has it all beat, though.
 

Lolita Twist

Rose-hustler
However... sitting around a kitchen table drinking, smoking, talking, and laughing - you may never know you are amongst a poet. (The word is starting to bother me now that I've read it and said it so many times. It doesn't sound like a real word anymore). I suppose I'm fascinated by people when you get them loose and talking - and that's a huge muse. You start to go insane with the thoughts that come out you - no one is really a bad person.
 

Ponder

"So fuck Doubleday Doran"
RIP
POET

However... sitting around a kitchen table drinking, smoking, talking, and laughing - you may never know you are amongst a poet. (The word is starting to bother me now that I've read it and said it so many times. It doesn't sound like a real word anymore)

The poet Victor Valoff was not a very good poet. He had a local reputation,
was liked by the ladies and supported by his wife. He was continually
giving readings at local bookstores and he was often heard on the
Public Radio Station. He read in a loud and dramatic voice but the pitch
never varied. Victor was always at climax. That's what attracted the
ladies, I guess. Certain of his lines, if taken separately, seemed to have
power, but when all the lines were considered as a whole, you knew
that Victor was saying nothing, only saying it loudly.
But Vicki, like most ladies, being easily charmed by fools, insisted
upon hearing Valoff read. It was a hot Friday night in a Feminist-Lesbian-
Revolutionary bookshop. No admission. Valoff read for free.


Excerpt of a short story. © Charles Bukowski
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Lolita Twist

Rose-hustler
I believe I underlined that when I first read it in whichever book it appeared in... however, I have no idea how it pertains to sitting around a kitchen table drinking and laughing?
 
in most cases that I know, poetry is just as lousy as poets.

and with both, poetry And poets, the exceptions are true highlights to fill your life with.
 
As if poets weren't bad enough, the term OUTLAW POETS strikes me as totally dumb.
What do they do? Shoplifting, getting a ticket for parking on the wrong side, considering the ticket a poem and the officer a poet, drug dealing, murder?
Anything illegal?
Not saying they should, but writing in an unorthodox way makes none of them outlaw.
A marketing term, yes, I guess that's what it is.

I shouldn't care about it and drink a lot less coffee at this time of the day, it makes me too upset.
 

Lolita Twist

Rose-hustler
However... getting a parking ticket could be considered mundane. And didn't McCullers say "see what is invisible, and you will see what to write?". Isn't Buk so good, because he "saw as much color in a brick as he did in a rose"? Mundane = good stuff, yes?

I'm on no one's side here, I'm just on hydro.
 

Lolita Twist

Rose-hustler
Don't many people here write? Don't many people here write poetry? Therefore, aren't many people here being hypocritical?
 

hoochmonkey9

Art should be its own hammer.
Moderator
Founding member
no. we're being nasty and petty, not hypocritical. all poets are nasty and petty to other poets. it's a rule.

if you want to cut it in the poetry game, you better get on board. unless, of course, you're an Outlaw Poet.
 

mjp

Founding member
aren't many people here being hypocritical?
How is it hypocritical to call a group useless just because you happen to be part of the group?

Hypocrisy would be, say, calling yourself an outlaw, and then calling the police when someone robs you.
 

Gerard K H Love

Appreciate your friends
What does Outlaw mean here?

I got the impression that when they (S.A. Griffin) named it Outlaw Poetry they were referring to not following the rules of poetry.

Correct me since I am undoubtedly not right.....but is there a school of thought or style that has a certain way poetry is to be written. Therefore Bukowski, who is not included in this collection, was one of the writers to not follow the same old meatloaf way of writing poetry. I might not be wrong.
 

Rekrab

Usually wrong.
Don't many people here write? Don't many people here write poetry? Therefore, aren't many people here being hypocritical?

Lolita, it might appear so, but honestly, I often look in the mirror and want to gag. We're not all being hypocritical, necessarily. Some of us are just being honest. I can't stand the average poet. I am a poet. Many of my friends are poets. I like them as people, not as poets, although I might like their poems. It's a separating of the person from the role. The absolute upside down fuckedness of everything in sight forces us to become something we call a poet or artist or whatever. If the world were straight, we would all be shining angel children. I guess.
 

mjp

Founding member
...is there a school of thought or style that has a certain way poetry is to be written.
Yeah. 75 years ago. Before any of the outlaw poets were born.

S.A. Griffin, since you mention him, never lived in a world that would be shocked or offended by the kind of poetry he writes. That trail was blazed a long time ago.

It's so funny and sad, calling yourself an outlaw when the wildest thing you do is drive 2 miles out of your way to buy fair trade coffee beans. Wear jeans with your blazer when you attend college alumni functions. Dress your babies in ironic t-shirts and buy them little sunglasses.

Everybody run! The outlaw poets are coming! Run for your lives!
 

hoochmonkey9

Art should be its own hammer.
Moderator
Founding member
my wife's parents call me an Inlaw Poet.



hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!


ummmm...
 

Lolita Twist

Rose-hustler
Lolita, it might appear so, but honestly, I often look in the mirror and want to gag. We're not all being hypocritical, necessarily. Some of us are just being honest. I can't stand the average poet. I am a poet. Many of my friends are poets. I like them as people, not as poets, although I might like their poems. It's a separating of the person from the role. The absolute upside down fuckedness of everything in sight forces us to become something we call a poet or artist or whatever. If the world were straight, we would all be shining angel children. I guess.

I think any poet worth reading isn't evidently a poet at all - just... you know, a person.
 

Rekrab

Usually wrong.
You're right. Any poet worth reading isn't considered a real poet by the powers that be.

I would rather be published by some barely surviving on a shoe-string small press nobody ever heard of than a university press. Not that I've had any offers to turn down from the academics.
 

Rekrab

Usually wrong.
To clarify, speaking only for myself, when I disparage poets, what I am criticising is not the creative person per se, but the self-serving, back-stabbing ego mania of the competitive poet who claws his/her way to the top of the dung hill. It's an ugly thing, and so ridiculous, because the larger world doesn't give a fig for poetry. It's the battle of the small pond. When I see it (in others, in myself), I am repulsed. My only desire is to write the best poems I can, and to get them in the hands of people who will appreciate them and hopefully draw some pleasure from them. Being recognized by the masses is monstrous and meaningless. Prizes, awards, prestigious publication have no attraction to me and seem counter productive. Being published by Bill Roberts means a hell of a lot more. That is true distinction.
 
Top